The Marginalization of Shakespeare's Female Counterparts: Shakespeare Birthday Event
While we all can agree
that we were forced to read Shakespeare in high school, can anyone recall
reading a female author that lived during Shakespeare's time period? I know
that I didn't get to read any female authors prior to Emily Dickenson and the
Bronte sisters that wrote later on in the 1800s. Yet, authors such as Margaret
Cavendish and Amelia Lanier also wrote during this time period, but are widely
ignored in education until students reach college. Consequently, this is when I
first encountered these female authors.
Why are the
female counterpart’s of Shakespeare not widely read? Is it because we focus on
Shakespeare and his male contemporaries too much? It is difficult to go through college without reading something written by Shakespeare or Ben Johnson as their
writings were highly influential. While new editions of Shakespeare's plays are
released every few years, several works written by Shakespeare's female
contemporaries are just now being placed in anthologies and collections.
Why are
they not as widely read? It could be because of the subjects of which they
wrote about. Since there were very few female writers during this time period,
they were more restricted than men were in regards to their material. While men
could write about race relations, scandals, politics and romances, women are
marginalized to writing about religion and child rearing. The things that women
were allowed to write about without receiving social stigma were limited to
their roles within society. They could write about being wives, mothers and
their religion. However, these social stigmas did not stop these female authors
from using these guises to write about other topics as well such as women's
rights.
Another reason could be
that they are not typically included in many anthologies. They are usually
taught in classes that discuss women authors or British/English Literature
exclusively. However, outside of these classes, these female authors are rarely
discussed. Even in K-12 education, discussion and reading of Shakespeare’s
contemporaries can be rare. While K-12 requires Shakespeare as one of the
required authors for students to read, other authors can themselves be
marginalized by Shakespeare, regardless of gender. Also, in K-12, many teachers
touch on the most influential authors such as Shakespeare, Charles Dickens and
etc. Perhaps a large part of why these authors are not taught is because of the
difficulty faced by instructors to provide their texts to students. While some
of these female authors have been anthologized, other female authors have not.
Instructors face a lack of resources to provide to their students in order to
teach these authors.
As the discussion of
these marginalized female authors increase and as they are researched more, it
is likely that they will be taught more as their works become more accessible
for instructors both teaching K-12 and college. However, we need to stop
thinking of these female authors as existing in Shakespeare’s shadow and
comparing them to him. These women faced more challenges in writing their works
as well as publishing their works. It is also likely that these women became
marginalized over the course of time as they were not read as widely during the
Classical and Neo-Classical literary periods where both authors and readers
looked back to the great writers of the past. Shakespeare would have been
compared to Socrates, Plato and Johnson as they had quite a large influence. Authors
such as Cavendish and Lanier may not have been as celebrated as a part of the ‘greats’
like Shakespeare was.
Comments
Post a Comment